Why No Time To Die Director Thinks Bond Movies Should Use Less CGI
No Time to Die director Cary Fukunaga thinks Bond films should use less CGI to retain greater authenticity in a new interview about the film.
no time to die Director Cary Joji Fukunaga thinks Bond movies should use less CGI. Fukunaga, who also co-wrote the 2017 Stephen King adaptation THIS, first rose to prominence as a director and executive producer for the first season of the HBO anthology show real detective, for which he won a Primetime Emmy Award. After the departure of Danny Boyle from the position of director for no time to die, Fukunaga’s involvement was announced in September 2018, and his appointment prompted some changes to the creative direction the film would take.
After several delays, caused by creative differences and the global pandemic, the 25th Bond film was released in the United States on October 8 to widespread critical acclaim and is widely credited with rejuvenating a struggling post-pandemic box office. grossing over $775 million worldwide. , and become the third highest-grossing film of all time in the UK. The film, which featured Daniel Craig’s final outing as James Bond, was hailed for its wit, action sequences and emotional weight, with many considering it a satisfying conclusion to the Craig era, which began in 2005. Casino Royale.
Speaking in a recent interview with Variety, Fukunaga, who also directed the Netflix miniseries Maniacal, spoke about the rich and storied history of the Bond franchise, as well as his belief that reliance on natural stunts should always prevail over CGI. Read the 44-year-old Californian’s comments on his approach to visual and special effects in the film below:
“As I progressed through my projects I got to know the times when we can do visual effects and make them seamless because the last thing you want is for a sequence to have the impression of coming from another type of film.
In a Bond movie, where stunts are performed for real, where a lot of it is tangible and on screen, you’re much more vulnerable to visual effects that somehow undermine that sense of reality. you are trying to create. So you have to be much more judicious in its use.”
As blockbusters get more and more money off their hits these days, studios are turning to technology and CGI to get the effects they want in a way that’s perceived to be cheaper and less time-consuming. . There’s no doubt that the use of CGI and green screen is starting to become more common in modern movies for good reason. However, as Fukunaga’s comments allude to, a franchise like Bond should have a certain degree of grit and authenticity, which is why so many stunts and action sequences are filmed practically and without the use of CGI. .
Of course, the future of the Bond franchise is unclear going forward, and now will be a time of transition for the production team as they seek to replace Craig as Bond. This could lead to a new creative direction with the character, which may well lend itself more to stories that require greater use of CGI and VFX. The franchise is no stranger to this technology, as shown Die another daythe infamous invisible car. However, for the most part, Bond has always been a franchise that has always tried to stay grounded in reality, at least visually, so it seems unlikely that CGI will take precedence over natural stunts even in future installments. It is clear that Fukunaga was determined to do no time to die in the vein of classic Bond movies and retain that sense of realism, and longtime fans will no doubt hope that continues in the future.
Source: Variety
About the Author